Al Husban, A. A. S., Al Husban, S. A. M., & Al Betawi, Y. (2016). Implementing the competences-based students-centered learning approach in Architectural Design Education. The case of the T MEDA Pilot Architectural Program at the Hashemite University (Jordan). Tuning Journal for Higher Education; Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Steps for innovation: course units design, classroom experiences, and employability. Retrieved from http://www.tuningjournal.org/article/view/1077/1455

Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bowe, F. (2000). Universal design in education: Teaching nontraditional students. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

Burgstahler, S. (2015, 2015). Universal design of instruction (UDI): Definition, principles, guidelines, and examples. Retrieved from https://www.washington.edu/doit/universal-design-instruction-udi-definition-principles-guidelines-and-examples

Burgstahler, S., & Cory, R. (2015). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Burke, D. D., Clapper, D., & McRae, D. (2016). Accessible online instruction for students with disabilities: Federal imperatives and the challenge of compliance. Journal of Law and Education, 45(2), 135-180. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.mnsu.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.mnsu.edu/docview/1802195473?accountid=12259

Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., & et al. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60.

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin(March).

Choi, B. (2016). How people learn in an asynchronous online learning environment: The relationships between graduate students’ learning strategies and learning satisfaction. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(1), 1-15.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (Fourth edition. ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.

Costley, J., & Lange, C. (2017). The effects of lecture diversity on germane load. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 18(2), 27-46. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2860

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Fifth edition. ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Cuevas, J., & Dawson, B. L. (2017). A test of two alternative cognitive processing models: Learning styles and dual coding. Theory and Research in Education, 16(1), 40-64. doi:10.1177/1477878517731450

Dallas, B. K., McCarthy, A. K., & Long, G. (2016). Examining the educational benefits of and attitudes toward closed captioning among undergraduate students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 16(2), 56-65. doi:10.14434/josotl.v16i2.19267

DeLong, R. (2008). Writing assignments and universal design for instruction: Making the phantom visible. In J. L. Higbee & E. Goff (Eds.), Pedagogy and student services for institutional transformation: Implementing universal design in higher education (pp. 131–136.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy.

Ernst, H., McGahan, W. T., & Harrison, J. (2015). Questionable benefit of visual and peer mediated learning on overall learning outcomes of a first-year physiology course. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 7. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A424714264/PROF?u=mnamsumank&sid=PROF&xid=3f3d021a

Fields, T. T., & Hatala, J. J. (2014). That, that, but not that. . . Using a cafeteria plan to enhance writing skills. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice & Research, 4(2), 3-11. doi:10.5929/2014.4.2.7

Finley, A. (2016). Problem solving and transparent teaching practices: insights from direct assessment. Peer Review, 18(1-2), 39. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/peerreview/2016/winter-spring/Finley

Goodwin, J. A., & Gilbert, B. D. (2001). Cafeteria-style grading in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(4), 490. doi:10.1021/ed078p490

Greer, D. L., Crutchfield, S. A., & Woods, K. L. (2013). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning, instructional design principles, and students with learning disabilities in computer-based and online learning environments. The Journal of Education, 193(2), 41-50. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24636945

Hanewicz, C., Platt, A., & Arendt, A. (2017). Creating a learner-centered teaching environment using student choice in assignments. Distance Education, 38(3), 273-287. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1369349

Heinrich, W. F., Habron, G. B., Johnson, H. L., & Goralnik, L. (2015). Critical thinking assessment across four sustainability-related experiential learning settings. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(4), 373-393. doi:10.1177/1053825915592890

Higbee, J. L. (2009). Implementing universal instructional design in postsecondary courses and curricula. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 6(8), 65-77. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.mnsu.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.mnsu.edu/docview/218884392?accountid=12259

Higher Learning Commission. (2014). HLC policy: Criteria for accreditation. In Criteria and Requirements. Chicago, IL: Higher Learning Commission.

Hu, S., McCormick, A. C., & Gonyea, R. M. (2012). Examining the relationship between student learning and persistence. Innovative Higher Education, 37(5), 387-395. doi:10.1007/s10755-011-9209-5

Izmirli, S., & Kurt, A. A. (2016). Effects of modality and pace on achievement, mental effort, and positive affect in multimedia learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(3), 299-325. doi:10.1177/0735633115621921

Jacob, F., Kincaid, S., & Traver, A. E. (2018). Poetry across the curriculum: New methods of writing intensive pedagogy for U.S. community college and undergraduate education. Leiden: Brill.

Kiramba, L. K. (2017). Multilingual literacies: Invisible representation of literacy in a rural classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(3), 267-277. doi:doi:10.1002/jaal.690

Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (Second Edition ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 380. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.380

McGahan, W. T., Ernst, H., & Dyson, L. E. (2016). Individual learning strategies and choice in student-generated multimedia. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 8(3), 1-18. doi:10.4018/IJMBL.2016070101

McGuire-Schwartz, M. E., & Arndt, J. S. (2007). Transforming universal design for learning in early childhood teacher education from college classroom to early childhood classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 28(2), 127-139. doi:10.1080/10901020701366707

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing.

Murray, E. A., Sheets, H. A., & Williams, N. A. (2009). The new work of assessment: Evaluating multimodal compositions. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from http://cconlinejournal.org/murray_etal/index.html

National Forum on Education Statistics. (2011). Forum guide to ensuring equal access to education websites: An introduction to electronic accessibility standards. (NFES 2011–807). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011807.pdf

Oberfoell, A., & Correia, A. (2016). Understanding the role of the modality principle in multimedia learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 607-617. doi:10.1111/jcal.12157

Oswal, S. K., & Meloncon, L. (2017). Saying no to the checklist: Shifting from an ideology of normalcy to an ideology of inclusion in online writing instruction. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 40(3), 61–77.

Rappolt-Schlichtmann, G., Daley, S. G., & Rose, T. (2012). A research reader in universal design for learning. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Education Press.

Raue, K., & Lewis, L. (2011). Students with disabilities at degree-granting postsecondary institutions. (NCES 2011–018). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011018.pdf

Rhodes, T. (2010). Assessing outcomes and improving achievement: Tips and tools for using the rubrics. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Roberts, K. D., Park, H.-J., Brown, S., & Cook, B. (2011). Universal design for instruction in postsecondary education: A systematic review of empirically based articles. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(1), 5-15. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ941728.pdf

Roberts, K. D., Satlykgylyjova, M., & Park, H.-J. (2015). Universal design of instruction in postsecondary education: A literature review of empirically based articles. In S. Burgstahler & R. Cory (Eds.), Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (2nd ed., pp. 65–80). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Scott, S. S., McGuire, J. M., & Foley, T. E. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A framework for anticipating and responding to disability and other diverse learning needs in the college classroom. Equity & Excellence in Education, 36(1), 40-49. doi:10.1080/10665680303502

Scott, S. S., McGuire, J. M., & Shaw, S. F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education. Remedial & Special Education, 24(6), 369-379. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=11399145&site=ehost-live

Silver, P., Bourke, A., & Strehorn, K. C. (1998). Universal instructional design in higher education: An approach for inclusion. Equity & Excellence in Education, 31(2), 47-51. doi:10.1080/1066568980310206

Stiller, K. D., Freitag, A., Zinnbauer, P., & Freitag, C. (2009). How pacing of multimedia instructions can influence modality effects: A case of superiority of visual texts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 184-203. doi:10.14742/ajet.1149

U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. (2016). The United States’ findings and conclusions based on its investiagtion under Title II of the American with Disabilities Act of the University of California at Berkeley, DJ No. 204-11-309.  Retrieved from https://www.ada.gov/briefs/uc_berkley_lof.pdf

U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, & University of Montana. (2014). Resolution agreement.  Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/10122118-b.pdf

United States of America v. Miami University et al.  (United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio 2016).

Wang, J., Dawson, K., Saunders, K., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Antonenko, P. p., Lombardino, L., . . . Davis, R. O. (2018). Investigating the effects of modality and multimedia on the learning performance of college students with dyslexia. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(3), 182-193. doi:10.1177/0162643418754530

Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: The crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1032-1047. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. Somerset: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

Winkelmes, M.-A. (2014). Transparency in teaching and learning in higher education project. Retrieved from https://tilthighered.com/

Winkelmes, M.-A., Bernacki, M., Butler, J., Zochowski, M., Golanics, J., & Weavil, K. H. (2016). A teaching intervention that increases underserved college students’ success. Peer Review, 18(1-2), 31.

World Wide Web Consortium. (2008). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0: W3C recommendation 11 December 2008. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

World Wide Web Consortium. (2018). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1: W3C recommendation 05 June 2018. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/

Yergeau, M., Brewer, E., Kerschbaum, S., Oswal, S. K., Price, M., Selfe, C. L., Salvo, M. J., & Howes, F. (2013). Multimodality in motion: disability & kairotic spaces. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 18(1). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/18.1/coverweb/yergeau-et-al/index.html

Young, A. (2003). Writing across and against the curriculum. College Composition and Communication, 54(3), 472-485. doi:10.2307/3594174>